Storelift Start measuring

StoreliftCompare › ASO tool pricing, compared

ASO tool pricing, compared

Almost every tool on this list advertises one number and starts ASO at another. The gap is not small: on one platform the headline is $9.99 and daily keyword ranks begin at $149.99. Here is both columns, read from each vendor's own pricing page in August 2026 — and the question worth asking before the price one.

Updated:

The advertised price, and the ASO price

The second column is the one to read. It is the cheapest tier on which you can track a keyword's rank every day — the thing most people open an ASO tool for.

ToolAdvertised fromWhere daily rank tracking startsWhat you're actually buying at the entry tier
StoreliftFreeFree1 app / 15 keywords / 1 storefront, measured nightly, no time limit
Sonar$23.25/mo ($12.42 billed yearly)same — one plan10 apps / 2,500 keywords / all countries / API on every plan. No permanent free tier; 7-day trial
Mobile Action$15/mo$69/moLite is 100 keywords, 3 competitors per app and 3 months of history
AppTweak€79/mo€79/mo500 keywords, one seat, 6 months of history. Campaign Manager, Reviews, Market Intelligence, the API and AI Visibility are each sold separately — AI Visibility only on Enterprise
Appfigures$9.99/mo$149.99/moThe $9.99 tier has no keyword tracking. Daily ranks start at $44.99; competitor keywords and the full ASO set at $149.99. Extra apps are +$1.99 each on every tier
AppFollowFree · $179/moFree tier: 20 keywords/moBuilt around review management and reply workflows. Free tier is 2 apps / 2 countries / 20 review replies a month — but it includes 5 team seats
Prices move and tiers get renamed. Every row links to the vendor's own pricing page under Sources. Two caveats we owe you: AppTweak publishes in euro and this table is not currency-adjusted, and AppFollow's tiers are not rendered on its public pricing page — those figures come from third-party listings, not from AppFollow.

Price isn't the axis that decides

The tools above are competent, and the expensive ones are expensive for reasons: market intelligence, ad management, review workflows, seats for a team. If you need those, they're worth their price and this page is not an argument against them.

The axis that actually decides is different: where does the number come from? Two tools can show the same "volume" column at $12 and at $299, both copied from the same place — Apple's advertising console. When that source moved in September 2025, both columns moved with it.

So before comparing tiers, ask three things of any tool you're evaluating:

  1. Can I verify a number myself? If a rank is 14, can you run the same search and see 14?
  2. What happens on a failed measurement? A gap in the chart is honest. A zero is a crash that never happened.
  3. Is the measurement depth printed on screen? "Not ranked" means nothing until you know whether the tool looked at 30 results or 100.
  4. Is there a published error rate? Ask it of any estimated figure — downloads, revenue, search volume. A number sold without one is not a measurement.

That fourth question is worth spending a paragraph on, because the estimate columns are where most of the money in this category sits. Vendors describe their models in detail — billions of training data points, real figures contributed by hundreds of thousands of apps — and then publish no error rate at all. Where a figure has surfaced historically it is a median across the whole corpus, and that corpus is weighted toward the apps large enough to share their data in the first place.

Which means the estimate is at its worst exactly where a small developer needs it most. An app with nine lifetime ratings sits in the tail the model saw least of, and nothing on screen tells you that. This is why Storelift shows no download or revenue estimates: not because the models are worthless, but because we won't print a number next to a measured one without being able to say how wrong it can be. Connect your own App Store Connect account and you see the real figure instead.

Where Storelift sits

Storelift is the narrow end of this list. It measures keyword rank (top 100 on iOS, top ~30 on Android), the apps ranking above you on each keyword, demand from App Store autocomplete, and store reviews — across 128 storefronts. Install and revenue figures come from your own account when you connect it, rather than from a model. It does not manage ad campaigns.

One thing on it is genuinely hard to get elsewhere, because it answers a question the category is still catching up with — people now ask an assistant which app to use. Storelift generates natural questions from your keywords and puts them to Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini, then reads each answer for whether your app is named and in what position. The three engines are reported separately and never averaged, because they disagree and the disagreement is the useful part.

One competitor measures this today. AppTweak launched AI Visibility in April 2026 and it is the more mature product — but it covers ChatGPT and Claude rather than three engines, publishes no country or language coverage, and sits on the Enterprise tier. Storelift includes it from $12.

Storelift also ships a public API and an MCP server on the Studio tier, so an assistant can read your measurements where you already work. This is worth saying plainly rather than dressing up: it is no longer unusual. Sonar's MCP server exposes considerably more than ours, Mobile Action ships one, and there are independent ASO MCP servers on npm. Treat it as table stakes when comparing, not as a reason to choose.

Free tiers are also more common here than vendors' marketing suggests — Appfigures and AppFollow both have one. The distinction worth checking is narrower: whether the free tier tracks keyword rank. Appfigures' does not, AppFollow's gives you twenty keywords a month, and most of the rest offer a time-limited trial instead. Storelift's free tier measures one app, 15 keywords and one storefront every night, with no end date. It exists because we needed it for our own portfolio of apps before anyone else used it.

Frequently asked

Is there a genuinely free ASO rank tracker?

Free tiers exist at Appfigures and AppFollow, but neither tracks keyword rank in a way most people would call rank tracking: Appfigures' free tier has no keyword tracking at all, and AppFollow's allows twenty keywords a month. Storelift's free tier tracks one app, 15 keywords and one storefront, measured nightly, with no end date. Everyone else on this page offers a time-limited trial instead.

Why do keyword limits differ so much between tools?

Because a tracked keyword is a recurring cost: every keyword, in every country, has to be measured every day. A tool advertising thousands of keywords cheaply is usually measuring less often, less deeply, or estimating.

Do I need a paid tool at all?

If you have one app, a handful of keywords and one market, a free tier answers your questions. Paid tiers start earning their price when you're running several apps or several countries, because the manual alternative stops fitting in a morning.

Why is the advertised price so often not the ASO price?

Because these platforms grew out of different products. Appfigures began as analytics, so its cheap tier tracks your own downloads and revenue and keyword ranking arrives much higher up. AppFollow began as review management. AppTweak sells ASO at its entry tier but bills Campaign Manager, Reviews, Market Intelligence, the API and AI Visibility separately. None of this is dishonest — but the headline figure answers a different question than the one you asked.

See this for your own app

Paste your store link, add your keywords. Rank, the apps above you and demand are measured every night.

Start free →

Read next

Sources